Full Sail Partners Blog | Deltek Clarity Report

Every year, the Deltek Clarity A&E Industry Study gives architecture and engineering firms something concrete to work with: real data from real firms about what's working, what's stalling, and where the industry is heading. The 47th edition surveyed 896 firms of all sizes and types, and the throughline is clear. This isn't a market that rewards guessing or going through the motions. The firms pulling ahead are the ones making intentional, disciplined decisions at every level of the business.

Project management is where that intentionality either shows up or doesn't. And this year's data makes clear that firms are choosing to show up.

Firms are investing in project managers on purpose

When firms were asked to name their greatest growth opportunity for the coming year, investing in project managers and project management ranked first, at 27%. That's not a small signal. It means firms are looking at their own performance and concluding that the fastest path to better outcomes isn't more headcount or more tools — it's a stronger PM function.

You can see that intentionality showing up in the numbers. Formal project management training climbed four percentage points this year, with 44% of firms now training at least half of their project leaders. Use of clearly defined PM processes held steady, with 68% of firms applying a formal process to at least half their work. These aren't dramatic leaps, but they're directional, and they matter because they attack the problem at its root.

That root problem has a name: competing priorities. For the sixth consecutive year, competing priorities tops the list of PM challenges, cited by 53% of firms. Project managers are being asked to balance delivery with business development, client management, and internal initiatives — often without any added structure to help them manage the load. Training solves part of this. So does giving PMs real visibility and the right tools. But the biggest lever might be the simplest one: role clarity. When a PM knows exactly what they own and what they don't, competing priorities stop competing quite so hard.

This is a place where a well-configured Deltek Vantagepoint setup earns its keep. Resource planning and project planning tools that reflect how your firm actually works — not just how the system shipped out of the box — give PMs the visibility to prioritize with confidence instead of guessing. If your current setup feels more like a filing cabinet than a decision-making tool, that's a configuration problem, not a Vantagepoint problem, and it's exactly the kind of thing our consulting team works through with firms every day.

You can't manage what you can't see

Project managers are also being asked to stay ahead of issues they often can't fully see. The Study asked firms to rate their visibility into key project metrics, and the split is telling. Visibility into cost variance and project-specific KPIs improved this year, with 56% and 55% of firms respectively reporting high or very high visibility. Schedule variance and client satisfaction visibility told a different story: only 31% of firms report strong visibility into schedule variance, and just 24% into client satisfaction.

That gap matters because schedule issues and client dissatisfaction rarely announce themselves. They build quietly, and by the time they're visible without good data, they've usually already compounded. Firms that give PMs clearer, earlier visibility into schedule status create room to course-correct before a small slip becomes a missed milestone. The same logic applies to client feedback: firms building structured feedback loops into the project lifecycle, rather than treating client check-ins as an afterthought, are better positioned to catch friction early and strengthen the relationship instead of just reacting to a complaint.

The good news is that this is measurably improving. The share of firms measuring client satisfaction rose to 41.6% this year, up 2.5 points, and more of that measurement is happening across all projects rather than just strategic ones. That's a shift toward treating feedback as a standard part of delivery, not a selective courtesy.

Closing this visibility gap is exactly what tools like Deltek Vantagepoint's reporting capabilities,paired with a platform like Informer, are built for. Dashboards that surface schedule and KPI data in real time — instead of buried in a spreadsheet someone updates once a month — give PMs the early warning system they need to actually act on a problem instead of just documenting it after the fact.

No accountability without metrics

For the first time, establishing PM accountability metrics debuted as the #1 initiative firms plan to pursue, chosen by 33% of firms. That's worth sitting with for a moment. Accountability has always mattered in project delivery. What's new is firms formally naming it as their top priority — which tells you that a lot of firms have been running the PMO without a clear, agreed-upon way to measure whether it's working.

You genuinely can't hold anyone accountable to a standard that doesn't exist in measurable form. That's where AI and other data-forward technologies earn their place in this conversation — not as a replacement for good management, but as the engine that surfaces the data and the story behind the data clearly enough to actually change behavior. A dashboard that just shows a red number doesn't move anyone. A tool that shows a PM why their schedule variance crept up, and what pattern is driving it across their whole portfolio, gives them something to act on.

This is the kind of gap Deltek's own AI orchestrator, Dela, is aimed at closing — surfacing those insights across the project lifecycle so accountability metrics come with some context, not just a number on a report. 

This is also where firms need to be honest about sequencing. Incorporating AI into project management debuted as a top-three PM challenge this year at 32% — a striking result for a brand-new option. Firms recognize AI's potential, but they're also recognizing that clean data and consistent processes have to come first. AI applied to messy inputs just produces confident-sounding noise faster. Get the fundamentals in place, and AI becomes a real productivity lever instead of another tool competing for a PM's attention.

Shared processes protect consistency

If accountability is the destination, consistent information management is the road that gets you there. When firms were asked about their top challenges managing project information, maintaining consistency and managing quality of deliverables tied for the top spot, each cited by 49% of firms. Administrative workload followed closely at 35%, and project document workflows, deliverable collaboration, and managing submittals and RFIs each landed at 28%.

Look at that list as a group instead of as isolated line items, and the pattern is obvious: consistency suffers when administrative workload is heavy and document workflows aren't built to handle it. A PM buried in manual file-sharing, redundant status updates, and scattered version control doesn't have the bandwidth left to maintain consistent standards, no matter how good their intentions are.

This is squarely a shared-process problem, and it's exactly the kind of gap FSP's consulting team is built to close — configuring Vantagepoint so document workflows, submittals, and project information actually live where they should, instead of in a dozen inboxes and shared drives. For firms syncing project data with outside systems, the Blackbox Connector platform removes another layer of manual administrative work by moving that data automatically instead of by hand. Every hour a PM doesn't spend chasing down a file is an hour they get back for the parts of the job that actually require judgment.

The human element still wins

For all the emphasis on data, tools, and accountability, it's worth pointing out what firms say they already do well: managing client relationships remains the top project management strength for the fourth consecutive year, cited by 80% of firms. Collaboration and communication held steady in second at 60%.

That's a meaningful data point in a conversation so focused on metrics and technology. It confirms there will always be a human element to this business, and that's not something firms should want to engineer away. The goal of better tools and cleaner data isn't to replace the relationship-building that PMs are clearly good at — it's to free up the time and mental space that's currently being eaten by administrative friction, so PMs can spend more of it on the relationships and judgment calls that actually move projects forward. It's the same logic that shows up in business development and marketing: automate the repetitive, reactive work so people can spend more time on the strategic work only they can do.

The bottom line

Training and metrics are the throughline in this year's Project Management data. Firms are training more project leaders, formalizing more processes, and — for the first time — naming accountability as their top initiative. The firms getting the most out of that shift are the ones giving PMs real visibility into schedules, costs, and client feedback, and pairing that visibility with metrics people are actually held to.

None of this replaces good project managers. It supports them — with the role clarity, the data, and the tools to do the human parts of the job better.

Catch up on the series so far: Technology Trends | Business Development | Financial Management

Next up: Human Capital Management — we'll close out the series with what the data says about turnover, training, and the people side of firm performance.

Every year, the Deltek Clarity A&E Industry Study gives architecture and engineering firms something concrete to work with: real data from real firms about what's working, what's stalling, and where the industry is heading. The 47th edition surveyed 896 firms of all sizes and types, and the throughline is clear. This isn't a market that rewards guessing or going through the motions. The firms pulling ahead are the ones making intentional, disciplined decisions at every level of the business.

Over the next few weeks, we're breaking down each section of the report. This week: Business Development.

More work, less reward

Here's the headline: firms submitted 32% more proposals in 2025 than they did the year before. That sounds like momentum. But the median capture rate fell 3.8 percentage points to 44.4% — the lowest it's been since 2019 and the sharpest single-year decline in the nine-year trend.

BD activity is rising, but converting pursuits to projects is becoming harder and more complex. The win rate data adds some nuance — the median slipped to 49% industrywide, but architecture firms were the outlier, actually gaining five points to 45%, likely reflecting tighter pursuit selection in a market where design-led work is more relationship-dependent. Almost nobody got easier wins this year.

Capture rate — the dollar value of proposals awarded relative to the dollar value submitted — makes the picture even clearer. Large firms dropped six points to 34%. Medium firms fell three points. The gap between the top quarter of firms (61.3%) and the bottom quarter (30.2%) is 31 percentage points — a spread that has less to do with market conditions and everything to do with how intentionally firms are choosing which work to chase.

High performers bucked the trend entirely, with their capture rate rising 10 percentage points to 59% while everyone else's fell. Same market, same headwinds, meaningfully better returns. The difference isn't luck or firm size or sector mix. It's the discipline to pursue less and win more.

Some of the decline reflects a market shift toward smaller-value projects — the total value of proposals submitted grew 12% while the number grew 32%, pointing to a lower average project value per pursuit. And a lot of it reflects what happens when more firms are chasing the same work in an increasingly crowded market.

The market itself is changing

It's not just that competition is stiffer — it's that the market opportunity itself is evolving.

Data centers debuted as a new category in this year's study and immediately claimed the top spot: 72% of firms expect to grow their position in that sector over the next 18 months. Energy and power held at 57%. These are sectors that barely registered a few years ago and are now driving significant optimism. Meanwhile, transportation dropped nine percentage points and hospitality continues its post-pandemic retreat. The firms best positioned for this environment aren't waiting for their traditional sectors to rebound — they're building credibility in new ones, which takes time, intentional relationship-building, and a clear-eyed view of where the firm can actually win.

Economic uncertainty compounds all of this. It debuted in this year's survey as a new BD challenge and immediately ranked as the top first-choice concern at 19%. The response isn't to slow down — it's to build a deeper pipeline and invest in positioning now rather than reacting when conditions shift.

Go/no-go decisions have never mattered more

Eighty percent of firms say they use a go/no-go process — but how they use it is shifting. Use for strategic opportunities only grew two percentage points to 32%, and use for all opportunities edged up to 38%. Among firms not yet using the process, 49% are now considering adoption, up from 29% the prior year. That's a meaningful signal.

A well-executed go/no-go process isn't a gate to slow things down. It's a filter that protects the firm's most valuable resource: pursuit capacity. As Daphne Bryant of ACEC put it in the report, it does more than filter opportunities — it aligns the firm's resources, expertise, and relationships with the pursuits that are truly winnable and worth winning.

The key word is data. Go/no-go decisions need to be driven by data-based questions — probability of winning, existing relationships, delivery capacity, fit for the work — not instinct or individual preferences. That's where a well-configured Deltek Vantagepoint environment earns its keep: relationship history, prior win/loss patterns, pipeline load, and delivery capacity all in one place. If your team is still making these decisions off a spreadsheet or a whiteboard, we should talk.

Pre-pursuit intelligence is a competitive edge — and AI is changing how firms build it

One of the most interesting data points in this section: lack of intel to position for a win dropped 15 percentage points — the steepest decline on the entire chart. Firms are getting smarter about the information available to them before they pursue, and AI-assisted tools are a big part of why — BD teams and principals are using them to surface opportunities earlier, qualify pursuits faster, find strategic partners and gather more context before committing resources.

But pre-positioning only works if the administrative burden is low enough to make room for it. That's where tools like Informer and Power BI, connected to Deltek Vantagepoint, pay off — surfacing win rates by sector, capture rate trends, and pursuit stage velocity in dashboards BD leaders can actually use day to day. We helped RTM Engineering Consultants build exactly this kind of visibility into their Vantagepoint environment — read how they did it. When your data is connected, your team spends less time hunting for answers and more time acting on them.

Formalizing the process (without making it rigid)

The share of firms with a formal BD process dipped three percentage points to 46% — worth examining but but not panicking over. As the seller/doer model expands and project managers take on more BD responsibility, a rigid step-by-step process often doesn't fit how the work gets done. The goal is practical frameworks — flexible enough to work across different markets and client types, consistent enough to create real pipeline visibility.

Vantagepoint has the infrastructure to support all of this — opportunity stages, pipeline reporting, relationship tracking, proposal history — but most firms are only using a fraction of it because the system wasn't configured with their specific workflow in mind. Full Sail Partners consultants work through exactly this with firms. Check out this demonstration on CRM in Vantagepoint to get the ideas flowing, then let's talk about building it around how your firm actually works.

The seller/doer model is thriving — and putting real pressure on project managers

The blended seller/doer model leads at 48%, and the seller/doer-only model holds second at 40%. Among high performers, seller/doer adoption rose nine percentage points to 55% — the clearest signal that top-performing firms are integrating BD responsibility into technical roles rather than siloing it. The reason is straightforward: clients want to talk to the people who will actually do the work.

But the model comes with real tension. Project managers edged down five percentage points to 14% "almost always responsible" for BD — a pullback that likely reflects what the industry already knows: the demands on PMs are often unrealistic. Cross-training for BD ranked third among top initiatives at 36%, up four points — a positive investment, but training alone doesn't solve a capacity problem.

The firms getting this right build structured time for BD into the PM role. And they invest in reducing friction in the tools. Project managers who can log a contact, update an opportunity stage, or check pipeline status inside the same system where they manage projects are far more likely to actually do it. If your PMs find BD tasks burdensome, that's often a workflow problem more than a motivation one. Our team can help.

The bottom line

The 2026 Clarity data on Business Development tells a consistent story: the environment rewards discipline, not volume. What separates high performers is a sharper, more intentional approach — to which pursuits they chase, how they position for them, and how they deploy the people responsible for bringing work in.

But discipline doesn't come from willpower alone. It comes from having the right data in front of the right people at the right time. That's what a well-configured Deltek Vantagepoint environment delivers — not just a system of record, but a foundation for smarter decisions across the entire BD lifecycle.

Full Sail Partners works with A/E/C firms at every stage — from first-time Vantagepoint implementations to established practices looking to get more out of a system they've had for years. We've seen the full picture, and we know where the gaps tend to show up. If you're ready to make your data work harder for your BD team, let's talk.

Next up in the series: Project Management. We'll dig into how firms are managing delivery pressure, what the data says about the most challenging phases of the project lifecycle, and where technology is creating the biggest opportunities.

Every year, Deltek's Clarity A&E Industry Study gives us something rare: a clear, data-driven look at how architecture and engineering firms are actually running their businesses — what's working, what's not, and where the industry is headed. The 47th Annual Clarity Study surveyed 896 firms of all sizes and types across North America. And this year, one theme runs through every section of the report: intentionality.

Firms aren't just spending — they're choosing. They're not just adopting — they're evaluating. The industry is moving away from reactive decision-making and toward strategic allocation. Quality over quantity. Fit over FOMO. That shift shows up clearly in the Technology Trends section, which is where we're starting this blog series.

The Problem with Shiny

Before we get into the data, here's the reality check that frames everything else.

When firms were asked to identify their top technology challenges over the next three years, three rose to the top:

• Prioritizing applicable technology trends (61% of firms)
• Lack of time to invest in learning (51%, up from 43%)
• Cost of technology (48%)

Read those together and a clear picture emerges: it's not that firms don't want to engage with new technology. It's that the landscape has gotten so crowded — and so loud — that figuring out what actually fits your firm has become its own full-time job. And nobody has time for that full-time job, because everyone is too busy doing their actual full-time jobs.

Think about where we are with AI right now. Every tool is positioned as the solution to every problem. Every vendor is promising transformation. It's the same conversation we had when social media exploded — do we need to be on TikTok? Some firms jumped in anyway. Others asked, "what problem does this solve for us?" and moved on. The firms asking that second question are the ones getting real value from their technology investments today.

That's the discipline the 2026 Clarity Study is pointing to. There's no room to chase something that clearly isn't a fit. The cost — in time, budget, and organizational focus — is too high.

Intention Is the Strategy

The data backs this up directly. 67% of firms say creating a strategic plan for implementing technology is their top initiative. Not adopting more tools. Not keeping up with trends. Planning. That's a meaningful signal about where A&E firms are in their technology maturity.

And it makes sense, because every level of a firm is touched by technology rollouts — from principals making the investment decision to project managers using new platforms to admin staff handling training. Day-to-day responsibilities crowd out the time needed to learn something new, which is why that "lack of time to invest in learning" challenge jumped eight percentage points in a single year. The firms that carve out dedicated learning time tied to specific tools and business objectives are the ones converting adoption into results.

Why Digital Maturity Matters

One concept weaves through the entire Technology Trends section and connects every data point: digital maturity. It's not just a buzzword. It's the measure of how well a firm's business strategy and IT management actually work together — and it's the thing that determines whether AI adoption pays off.

Currently, 33% of firms classify themselves as mature or advanced — nearly double the share from four years ago. The largest group (42%) sits in the "applied" stage, where business and IT goals are aligned but digital initiatives haven't yet reached their full potential. That's actually a strong place to be: you have the alignment. The work is using it to drive measurable business impact.

The urgency is real. 42% of firms believe they risk losing market share without meaningful digital progress within the next two years — up nine percentage points year over year. That number rises every year because the firms that do build their digital foundation keep pulling further ahead.

AI in Practice

It's impossible to talk about technology in A&E right now without talking about AI. Usage jumped from 53% to 70% in a single year — that's a 17-percentage-point climb. Generative AI use climbed to 78%, with growth across every use case.

But here's the more interesting story: where firms are applying AI is shifting.

The leading use of AI is now business process automation — 34% of firms, up 10 percentage points from last year. Think autonomous, task-oriented applications. The second leading use is providing insight into operational performance at 28% (up 17 percentage points). Firms are moving past the novelty of generative AI and into applications that directly affect how the business runs. For those of us who work closely with Deltek tools, this aligns with what we're seeing in practice — the firms getting the most out of platforms like Deltek Vantagepoint are the ones using integrated data to drive decisions, not just generate content.

The report makes an important point about AI benefits: the ones lower on the list require firms to more fully embrace the AI capabilities already available to them across project and financial systems. And sitting beneath all of it is a prerequisite that can't be skipped — clean data and integrated systems. AI is only as good as the data it runs on. Firms that have invested in data hygiene and system integration are seeing real returns. Firms that haven't are still chasing them.

What's Driving the Field

When it comes to technology specifically tied to project delivery, Building Information Modeling (BIM) remains the clear leader. 45% of respondents say BIM is very important to their firm's project delivery — up slightly from 43% last year. That's not going anywhere anytime soon. BIM is embedded in core workflows; it's not a trend anymore, it's infrastructure.

What's moving is everything around it. Sustainability (23%) and data analytics (20%) both dipped year over year — not because they became less relevant, but because AI is gaining ground. AI agents and AI-based automation nearly doubled in perceived importance, from 6% to 11% of firms rating it very important. When combined "very" and "somewhat" important ratings are included, that share jumped 12 percentage points to 48%.

Also worth noting: computer vision made its debut in this year's survey. Computer vision is AI that can interpret and analyze visual information — photos, video, scans — the way a human eye would, but faster and at scale. In A&E, that looks like automatically extracting specs from drawings and RFP documents, detecting safety hazards from drone footage on job sites, or comparing as-built conditions against design drawings to flag clashes before they become field problems. It premiered at 10% — a number worth watching.

It's Not If — It's When

We won't spend much space here, but this number is worth sitting with: only 3% of firms reported no attempted cyber attacks over the past three years.

Cybersecurity isn't a line item to revisit during budget season. It's a baseline operational requirement — and it's directly connected to the same digital foundation that makes everything else in this section work. If your AI adoption strategy doesn't include a cybersecurity layer, it's not a complete strategy.

Still Stuck on Manual?

Here's a truth that doesn't get enough attention: 80% of firms still report complete to moderate reliance on manual processes in administrative and management functions. In accounting and finance specifically, that number is 75%.

The report puts it plainly: reducing manual data entry is not simply an efficiency initiative. It's one of the most concrete steps a firm can take toward digital maturity.

Those manual processes aren't just slow — they're blocking progress. Clean, connected data is the foundation of every AI benefit we talked about above. Firms addressing manual processes now aren't just solving a near-term operational problem. They're laying the groundwork for meaningful AI returns down the road.

Cloud Is No Longer Optional

We'll close with the data point that, in our view, deserves the most attention — especially for firms still running on-premise systems.

The 2026 Clarity Study makes this clear: cloud infrastructure has moved from competitive differentiator to baseline requirement. Here's what the numbers look like:

• More than half of firms (58%) now report that at least 60% of their infrastructure leverages cloud or SaaS — up from 52% last year
• 42% of firms report that 80% or more of their systems are cloud-based — up from 37% last year
• Only 14% of firms remain in the earliest stages of cloud adoption (fewer than 20% of systems in the cloud), down from 20% last year

That last number is the telling one. Even the most cautious firms are making the move. And why? Because the cloud isn't just about where your data lives. It's about what becomes possible when your systems are connected, scalable, and AI-ready. The integration, security, and scalability that modern tools depend on are built into cloud infrastructure. If you don't have that foundation, you're working twice as hard to get half the results.

At Full Sail Partners, we've been having this conversation with our on-premise clients proactively. The data from this report reinforces what we've been seeing firsthand: the transition is coming for every firm. The question isn't whether to move — it's whether you get ahead of it strategically or wait until you're forced to scramble.

If your firm is ready to begin — or reengage in — the cloud conversion conversation, our team is here to help. Whether you're simply exploring timelines and considerations or actively planning your move, we can help you evaluate the right path forward. Reach out directly to your account manager or complete our contact form to start the conversation

The Bottom Line

The 2026 Deltek Clarity A&E Technology Trends section isn't telling firms to slow down on technology. It's telling them to aim better. The firms pulling ahead aren't adopting the most tools — they're using the right ones, built on a strong digital foundation, with a plan behind every decision.

Intentionality isn't a soft concept. It's a competitive advantage.

We'll be covering each section of the Clarity Study in this blog series — stay tuned as we dig into Business Development, Project Management, Human Capital Management, and Financial Management in the weeks ahead.

Want to talk through what the Clarity data means for your firm specifically? Contact us — we'd love to dig into it with you.

Every year, the Deltek Clarity A&E Industry Study gives architecture and engineering firms something concrete to work with: real data from real firms about what's working, what's stalling, and where the industry is heading. The 47th edition surveyed 896 firms of all sizes and types, and the throughline is clear. This isn't a market that rewards guessing or going through the motions. The firms pulling ahead are the ones making intentional, disciplined decisions at every level of the business.

Over the next few weeks, we're breaking down each section of the report. This week: Business Development.

More work, less reward

Here's the headline: firms submitted 32% more proposals in 2025 than they did the year before. That sounds like momentum. But the median capture rate fell 3.8 percentage points to 44.4% — the lowest it's been since 2019 and the sharpest single-year decline in the nine-year trend.

BD activity is rising, but converting pursuits to projects is becoming harder and more complex. The win rate data adds some nuance — the median slipped to 49% industrywide, but architecture firms were the outlier, actually gaining five points to 45%, likely reflecting tighter pursuit selection in a market where design-led work is more relationship-dependent. Almost nobody got easier wins this year.

Capture rate — the dollar value of proposals awarded relative to the dollar value submitted — makes the picture even clearer. Large firms dropped six points to 34%. Medium firms fell three points. The gap between the top quarter of firms (61.3%) and the bottom quarter (30.2%) is 31 percentage points — a spread that has less to do with market conditions and everything to do with how intentionally firms are choosing which work to chase.

High performers bucked the trend entirely, with their capture rate rising 10 percentage points to 59% while everyone else's fell. Same market, same headwinds, meaningfully better returns. The difference isn't luck or firm size or sector mix. It's the discipline to pursue less and win more.

Some of the decline reflects a market shift toward smaller-value projects — the total value of proposals submitted grew 12% while the number grew 32%, pointing to a lower average project value per pursuit. And a lot of it reflects what happens when more firms are chasing the same work in an increasingly crowded market.

The market itself is changing

It's not just that competition is stiffer — it's that the market opportunity itself is evolving.

Data centers debuted as a new category in this year's study and immediately claimed the top spot: 72% of firms expect to grow their position in that sector over the next 18 months. Energy and power held at 57%. These are sectors that barely registered a few years ago and are now driving significant optimism. Meanwhile, transportation dropped nine percentage points and hospitality continues its post-pandemic retreat. The firms best positioned for this environment aren't waiting for their traditional sectors to rebound — they're building credibility in new ones, which takes time, intentional relationship-building, and a clear-eyed view of where the firm can actually win.

Economic uncertainty compounds all of this. It debuted in this year's survey as a new BD challenge and immediately ranked as the top first-choice concern at 19%. The response isn't to slow down — it's to build a deeper pipeline and invest in positioning now rather than reacting when conditions shift.

Go/no-go decisions have never mattered more

Eighty percent of firms say they use a go/no-go process — but how they use it is shifting. Use for strategic opportunities only grew two percentage points to 32%, and use for all opportunities edged up to 38%. Among firms not yet using the process, 49% are now considering adoption, up from 29% the prior year. That's a meaningful signal.

A well-executed go/no-go process isn't a gate to slow things down. It's a filter that protects the firm's most valuable resource: pursuit capacity. As Daphne Bryant of ACEC put it in the report, it does more than filter opportunities — it aligns the firm's resources, expertise, and relationships with the pursuits that are truly winnable and worth winning.

The key word is data. Go/no-go decisions need to be driven by data-based questions — probability of winning, existing relationships, delivery capacity, fit for the work — not instinct or individual preferences. That's where a well-configured Deltek Vantagepoint environment earns its keep: relationship history, prior win/loss patterns, pipeline load, and delivery capacity all in one place. If your team is still making these decisions off a spreadsheet or a whiteboard, we should talk.

Pre-pursuit intelligence is a competitive edge — and AI is changing how firms build it

One of the most interesting data points in this section: lack of intel to position for a win dropped 15 percentage points — the steepest decline on the entire chart. Firms are getting smarter about the information available to them before they pursue, and AI-assisted tools are a big part of why — BD teams and principals are using them to surface opportunities earlier, qualify pursuits faster, find strategic partners and gather more context before committing resources.

But pre-positioning only works if the administrative burden is low enough to make room for it. That's where tools like Informer and Power BI, connected to Deltek Vantagepoint, pay off — surfacing win rates by sector, capture rate trends, and pursuit stage velocity in dashboards BD leaders can actually use day to day. We helped RTM Engineering Consultants build exactly this kind of visibility into their Vantagepoint environment — read how they did it. When your data is connected, your team spends less time hunting for answers and more time acting on them.

Formalizing the process (without making it rigid)

The share of firms with a formal BD process dipped three percentage points to 46% — worth examining but but not panicking over. As the seller/doer model expands and project managers take on more BD responsibility, a rigid step-by-step process often doesn't fit how the work gets done. The goal is practical frameworks — flexible enough to work across different markets and client types, consistent enough to create real pipeline visibility.

Vantagepoint has the infrastructure to support all of this — opportunity stages, pipeline reporting, relationship tracking, proposal history — but most firms are only using a fraction of it because the system wasn't configured with their specific workflow in mind. Full Sail Partners consultants work through exactly this with firms. Check out this demonstration on CRM in Vantagepoint to get the ideas flowing, then let's talk about building it around how your firm actually works.

The seller/doer model is thriving — and putting real pressure on project managers

The blended seller/doer model leads at 48%, and the seller/doer-only model holds second at 40%. Among high performers, seller/doer adoption rose nine percentage points to 55% — the clearest signal that top-performing firms are integrating BD responsibility into technical roles rather than siloing it. The reason is straightforward: clients want to talk to the people who will actually do the work.

But the model comes with real tension. Project managers edged down five percentage points to 14% "almost always responsible" for BD — a pullback that likely reflects what the industry already knows: the demands on PMs are often unrealistic. Cross-training for BD ranked third among top initiatives at 36%, up four points — a positive investment, but training alone doesn't solve a capacity problem.

The firms getting this right build structured time for BD into the PM role. And they invest in reducing friction in the tools. Project managers who can log a contact, update an opportunity stage, or check pipeline status inside the same system where they manage projects are far more likely to actually do it. If your PMs find BD tasks burdensome, that's often a workflow problem more than a motivation one. Our team can help.

The bottom line

The 2026 Clarity data on Business Development tells a consistent story: the environment rewards discipline, not volume. What separates high performers is a sharper, more intentional approach — to which pursuits they chase, how they position for them, and how they deploy the people responsible for bringing work in.

But discipline doesn't come from willpower alone. It comes from having the right data in front of the right people at the right time. That's what a well-configured Deltek Vantagepoint environment delivers — not just a system of record, but a foundation for smarter decisions across the entire BD lifecycle.

Full Sail Partners works with A/E/C firms at every stage — from first-time Vantagepoint implementations to established practices looking to get more out of a system they've had for years. We've seen the full picture, and we know where the gaps tend to show up. If you're ready to make your data work harder for your BD team, let's talk.

Next up in the series: Project Management. We'll dig into how firms are managing delivery pressure, what the data says about the most challenging phases of the project lifecycle, and where technology is creating the biggest opportunities.

According to this year’s Deltek Clarity Architecture & Engineering (A&E) Industry Study, it is looking to be a landmark year for the architecture and engineering industry with net revenue growth forecasted to grow to 17.6%. A&E is doing quite well despite the pandemic with the highest net revenue growth in the last ten years at 11.4%. This increase is assisted by A&E’s market position, which is expected to either grow or remain steady in markets across the board. Most notably water/waste/stormwater, transportation, and industries that fall under the “other” category (such as life sciences and senior living) are predicted to see great increases. As a result, firms will not only need to strategically pursue the right projects but will also need to grow and develop a staff to deliver on these projects.

Top Business Development (BD) Challenges 

The ever-changing nature of the business world is continuing to keep firms on their toes with new challenges. Unlike the previous year, a majority of firms (78%) have identified that finding and retaining qualified staff has been a struggle for them. This is coupled with other mass-reported problems such as staffing shortages and difficulty retaining employees. Staffing challenges have a direct impact on business development, not only lacking adequate staff to conduct business development activities but also not being able to provide the most qualified teams to win and deliver on projects. 

Time to nurture client relationships is the top business development challenge for A&E firms according to the report. With favorable market conditions, new opportunities will be plentiful which poses a challenge for firms to keep up with their clients. Time is money and time is also in short supply. With the reporting firms revealing an average work backlog of nearly 9 months, it is clear that companies must find a way to increase productivity. Upskilling business development talent and streamlining the BD process will help to free up time to strategically nurture client relationships. 

Other top BD challenges from the study include increased competition and identifying prospects. Firms must differentiate and hone branding across thought leadership and social marketing channels to distinguish themselves in the marketplace. Additionally, with a positive industry outlook this year, firms will need to be more strategic in pursuits that work best for their company’s strengths. 

Increased Formal Business Development Process 

Of the companies surveyed, 45% have a formal business development process, which is an increase going up from 39% the previous year. Though this means that 55% of firms surveyed still do not have any formal business development process. In these cases, responsibility for business development tasks is most often pushed to the executive team, project managers, and marketing staff. While dedicated business development staff may not be necessary in every case, it is important not to overlook the kind of work they do. Most notably, they tend to client relationship development, proposal development and networking, but they have plenty of other duties as well. Their jobs help to create new business opportunities, and within the last year active client relationships, requests for proposals and networking placed in the top five sources of new opportunities in the surveyed firms. 

A Positive Year for Proposals Requires Evaluation 

As suggested by the Deltek Clarity study, operating in a market with limited resources but high demand, the go/no go process is significant to evaluate the projects firms will pursue. While the number of firms employing the go/no go process has increased in the last year, there is still a large population who do not utilize it in the slightest. Of the companies who reported, 22% don’t use any kind of go/no go process. Listed below are the top three questions that businesses ask when deciding whether or not to accept a proposal: 

• Is it a good fit for the type of work we do? 
• Do we have an existing relationship with the client? 
• Do we have the staff to deliver the project?   

This method of weeding out less profitable projects is more useful than ever, as a significant rise in the number of proposals submitted and the number awarded in firms of all sizes was observed. In-kind, the average win rate of proposals has increased in the last year to 49.2%, the highest it’s been since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The average capture rate is also up from the previous year, now standing at 48.5%. 

Marketing Techniques Present and Future 

A majority of businesses reported using social media posts for marketing, with only 16% not indicating any use. This was followed by client-specific marketing at 67%, trade shows/exhibits at 56%, email marketing at 54% and thought leadership at 42%. The order of these marketing methods is projected to change, however, with the study offering up that client-specific marketing could overtake social media marketing within the next five years. Thought leadership is predicted to advance to third place among important marketing techniques, with trade shows/exhibits and email marketing falling more and more by the wayside. 

Business Development Initiatives 

Based on this year’s study, some of the priority business development (BD) initiatives for A&E firms are hiring additional staff, earlier identification of opportunities and requirements and expanding geographically. Since BD has not been spared from staffing challenges, and firms are seeing more proposals, projects, and nurturing opportunities, the focus on obtaining the best-qualified staff is of tantamount importance. Another area that has grown in importance is the geographic expansion of firms requiring yet again additional staff. One more initiative to identify opportunities and their requirements remains top of the list as well. Teams shouldn’t be wasting time and their resources on projects that are not winnable. 

Final BD Outlook from Deltek Clarity 

The 43rd Deltek A&E Clarity study found that while the world still is not clear about the pandemic, things are looking up for the industry. The top problems of participating firms are not dire, and by focusing on the employee base and current client relationships, these issues can be fixed. This year’s Deltek Clarity report also noted that freeing up time is necessary to clear the obstacles in the way of each business regarding BD. To remedy this, employing the go/no go process and better utilizing the tools provided by Deltek to streamline the BD process is suggested. 

How does your company stack up to those that participated in the survey? For a more in-depth look at the data behind the 43rd Deltek A&E Clarity study, use the link below to receive the report for free right now! 

It’s no surprise that finding and retaining top talent is a challenge facing every architecture and engineering (A&E) firm in North America but what specific human capital management (HCM) challenges are there? How do firms compare to the industry and what do the numbers really tell them? This overview is the first piece in a two-part series that will dig into the HCM specific challenges revealed from the 43rd Annual Deltek Clarity Study.  

Every Department Impacted by Staffing Shortages

Almost every area of the Deltek Clarity Study cited human capital management (HCM) towards the top, if not the number one challenge to growth. Many industries, including A&E, have been affected by the great resignation. Specifically, firms are saying it’s hard for them to win more business because they’re not necessarily certain that they can go ahead and staff projects. Hiring additional staff has become of paramount concern for A&E firms right now.  

The top financial challenges indicated from the Clarity study are finding and retaining qualified staff. This isn’t about a certain number of staff, but really finding qualified people that can handle the type of work and the different projects the firms have. This need is leading to more career development and training initiatives by A&E firms.  

Similar top challenges are cited in the project management area, including staff shortages and inexperienced project managers. So, how do firms develop project managers? How do they get the project managers up and running so they manage projects effectively? Part of the solution is hiring more experienced project managers, but other top initiatives include developing internal project manager best practices and investing in internal project manager training. 

Top Challenges for Human Resources 

The study asked what the top three challenges were for managing human resources. The number one response was retaining employees followed very closely by employee engagement/experience. Firms are realizing that they need to really become proactive in their retention and engagement efforts.  

No longer are firms just competing with companies in their own geographic region. With the rise of remote work, A&E firms are competing with other firms located across the country and talent is being recruited away from other areas. Other top challenges included career development, planning and performance management.  

Top Talent Acquisition Challenge 

The Deltek Clarity Study asked about the top acquisition challenges A&E firms are facing. The top response was the availability of good candidates in the marketplace. Based on this, it might be a good time for firms to step back to look at how they can change their practices or modernize their efforts to support recruiting.  

Specifically, this requires identifying what a good candidate means to the firm. The firm should ask what makes somebody who handles a role in the firm successful at it? Does the firm basically just review previous job descriptions or job profiles and reuse those? Has the firm really looked at what makes people successful in their specific role and in the firm as a whole from a culture perspective? 

After doing this initial analysis, the firm should evaluate what it is doing to diversify. Diversifying the talent pools makes sure that the firm is putting itself in the best position to find candidates that meet the profile developed. Also, the firm should consider what roles can be handled remotely. 

Firms should think about this from both angles – first doing a good job of understanding what makes people successful at the firm and then diversifying the talent pools to widen the marketplace. 

A&E Industry HR Statistics  

To give some idea of how a firm fits within the North American A&E industry, here are some high-level statistics related to human resources from the 43rd Deltek A&E Study: 

• Employee turnover has increased a little from the previous year and is at 13.6%. 
• Staff growth overall is up to 3.2% which means that despite a higher turnover rate, firms are still growing.  
• However, offers accepted decreased and is sitting at 77.4%.  

• Only about 50% of firms in the survey had more open positions last year, while this year’s survey saw 65% of firms with more open positions.  
• The time to fill positions is becoming longer and longer, with 50% of firms saying it’s taking 60+ days to fill open positions.  

Gen Y Has Taken Over 

The Deltek Clarity Study looked at both generational composition firm wide and by management level. Firm wide, the Millennials (Gen Y) have taken over the greatest portion of staff making up 39%. It’s important to note that Gen Z is coming right up behind which really starts to play into how firms develop their culture and organization.  

The top-level leadership roles in organizations are currently held by Gen X, nearly 70%, but the study reveals that in the first to lower-level management, the younger generations are beginning to take over a lot of those positions. This is great because firms are starting to see new thoughts, new processes, modernization, and a lot of variety and diversity. A&E firms will continue to see this trend in terms of those generational shifts to the younger generation from a management perspective which will affect recruiting, retention, and talent development.  

Top Tools Used to Develop Talent 

Firms cited coaching and mentoring, external education programs, and leadership development programs as their top three tools used to develop talent. The very top method is coaching and mentoring. Firms should ensure that coaches and mentors are available to make the best impression on employees. Firms should not just rely on who has been at the firm the longest for choosing their mentors and should make sure that these mentors are equipped with the right skills to bring other staff along.  

Engaging Employees Too Late 

The Clarity study showed that 86% of firms conduct exit interviews, but these interviews are often too late. Many times, these type of exit interviews are not as effective for getting honest responses from the employees because they are simply trying to get through the exit process and leave the firm. Unfortunately, many firms are spending a lot of time on this strategy rather than on other strategies such as stay interviews or pulse surveys.  

Only 30% of firms conduct pulse surveys. Pulse surveys are quick hit surveys where the firm can get answers. They can be sent to the recent hires on their onboarding experience, for example. The idea is to gauge the pulse in real time throughout the course of the year.  

Dig Deeper into the 43rd Annual Deltek Clarity Report 

To get more details on A&E firm HCM trends or other interesting findings, download the full Deltek A&E Clarity report. Click the image below to grab a free copy of the report along with a scorecard to chart the firm’s results. Don’t forget to stay tuned for the second installment in this series that will share some ways firms can use this information to improve processes and help meet some of these HCM challenges. 

Managing and delivering successful projects is the goal of every architecture and engineering (AE) firm. For most, it’s nearly a repeatable process that requires some minor adjustments to the work breakdown structure to meet the unique needs of a project’s scope. Year after year, AE firms continued with this same process while making improvements based on lessons learned. Then all of a sudden, everything in our world was altered, including the way AE firms manage and deliver successful projects.

However, it’s not all gloom and doom. There’s actually good news to report! According to the 42^nd Deltek AE Clarity Report, firms of all sizes dealt with the uncertainty and unexpected changes very well.

Clarity on Project Management Success    

Overall, the majority of firms that responded to the Deltek AE Clarity Survey indicated that their projects stayed on schedule with some being ahead. This is great to hear, and there is more. Most of the respondents also indicated that projects remained on or under budget in 2020. This is a consistent result year after year in the AE Clarity Study findings. As 2020 was filled with uncertainty with no clear end in sight, staying on or under budget is an amazing accomplishment. Kudos to those firms!

Clarity on Challenges for Project Managers

Interesting enough, it is hard to link the effects of the pandemic to the findings in the Deltek AE Clarity Study. Overall, project status visibility issues continue to be reported as a common challenge for project managers over the past few years. Furthermore, visibility into project cost variance remains a top reason for not being able to identify project overruns before it is too late.

Highlighting other challenges AE firms experienced in 2020, tracking project KPIs continues to hinder project managers and jeopardize the successful outcome of projects. This is followed by schedule variance visibility, which only had a small upward change from previous AE Clarity Study findings. In summary, project visibility issues remain problematic but can be easily resolved by using a project management software built specifically for AE firms.

Clarity on Client Satisfaction

Mentioned, but less of a focus for project managers, is visibility into client satisfaction throughout the project life cycle. In the survey, only 40% of firms stated that they measured and tracked client satisfaction. What makes this troubling is that it is a fact that the client experience (CX) and client satisfaction has a direct impact on the ability to win future work.

For many firms, this is an unaddressed problem because they have neither a formalized CX initiative nor a solution to help track client satisfaction. This is likely because these firms are unaware that there are resources to improve their CX. Full Sail Partners is an active partner with Client Savvy, the creators of the Client Feedback Tool and the CXPS Community and can help firms to acquire these needed CX resources.

Clarity on Future Project Management Initiatives

AE firms historically have embraced a business model that forces project managers to wear multiple hats at the firm. However, this seems to be changing with more firms stating they want to:

• Clearly define responsibilities for project management, business development and design work.
• Invest in internal project manager training.
• Develop internal project management best practices.

Surprisingly, all respondents to the AE Clarity Study indicated one of these as a top priority at their firm. Further down on the list of the top initiatives for AE firms is the need to hire more qualified talent. Noted in the Human Capital Management section of the AE Clarity Study, firms stated that the availability of good talent is a top acquisition challenge.

AE Clarity on the Future of Project Management

AE firms looking for future success have recognized the need to pay more attention to the discipline of project management. Moving forward, project managers need to focus on delivering successful projects. Firm leaders need to find others to share or take on the work of business development and let designers focus on creating. In other words, firms need to give the discipline of project management the respect and attention it deserves.

The Light at the End of the Tunnel

With all the uncertainty of 2020, AE firms remained resilient when faced with adversity. This says a lot about an industry that is directly affected by economic ups and downs. Overcoming what could have been an industry crippling situation, firms adapted, and project managers stepped up to continue to deliver great projects.

The Deltek AE Clarity Report is an insightful study that firm leaders should review each year. Additionally, firm leaders should use the available scorecard to benchmark their firm’s results with the rest of the industry. Get a free copy of the Study and the scorecard using the button link below.

Starting with the obvious, all departments and roles at AE firms were directly impacted by the global pandemic. This is emphasized in each section of the 42^nd Deltek AE Clarity Study. However, the Human Capital Management (HCM) segment highlights another challenge firms are facing – a multigenerational workforce.

Today, an AE firm’s workforce can include members of up to four generations. This infusion of differing opinions about professionalism, work-life balance, and overall expectations of an employer has pushed many company leaders to shift their culture to embrace these differences. While some firms have accepted this multigenerational workforce, others have chosen to keep up their traditional methods – until now.

When the COVID-19 global pandemic struck, expectations of flexible schedules, more casual work environments, and telecommute options were thrust upon everyone without warning. Even those that were steadfastly against the idea of hybrid workers. Now, we are at the crossroads of two seemingly unrelated challenges that have a common solution, and the pros and cons of this evolving workforce dynamic are highlighted in the 42^nd Deltek AE Clarity Study.

New Human Capital Management Challenges

Great workforce management requires consistency, which is everything that work, and life hasn’t been since 2020. As a result, this imbalance has created a new leading challenge for AE firms in terms of HCM. According to the 42^nd Deltek AE Clarity Study, succession and career development planning jumped to first place from third place in the previous study. Subsequently, performance management and employee engagement fell to second and third place.

On the surface, these challenges are expected in the given circumstances. Taking a deeper dive, learning and development programs ranked fourth overall and was considered a top three challenge for forty-eight percent of survey respondents. Looking below the surface, succession and career development planning, and learning and development programs are closely linked. Therefore, it’s logical that the increase in ranking in both these challenges goes hand in hand.

Employee Turnover and Staffing Levels

Overall, survey respondents reported that employee turnover rate went down over one percent. This may seem like a small change, but it goes against trends documented in past surveys. In previous years, AE firms reported increases in employee turnover rates. Likely because of the strong economy. Since 2020, it has been likely that employees preferred to stay with their existing employer for stability instead of taking a leap of faith with a new company during uncertain times.

In terms of personnel growth over the previous year, firm respondents stated that they had an increase of 0.5% which is nearly 3% less than reported in the 41^st Deltek Clarity Study. This is likely the result of hiring freezes during uncertain times. Additionally, thirty-three percent of firms reported having more open positions at the time of the survey and fifty percent had fewer open positions. Encouraging is the fact that forty-eight percent of respondents state the reason for open positions is solely because of firm growth.

Talent Acquisition Challenges

One of the least surprising findings of the 42^nd Deltek AE Clarity Study is that the availability of good candidates in the marketplace once again ranked number one in terms of top talent acquisition challenges. The simple cause and effect assumption is to connect this finding to the decrease in employee turnover rates and other factors like uncertainty about the future economy. But what impact will the pandemic and a new hybrid workforce has on talent acquisition challenges.

For years, firms have competed for talent within their local geographies. However, the global pandemic has allowed firms to embrace their evolving workforce, and employee can be an effective member of the team whether they are at the office or at their home. When taking into consideration the changes created by the pandemic, the challenges of the past, such as matching qualified candidates to open positions and offering competitive compensation will likely become minute in comparison to the other challenges listed in the Clarity Study.

Focusing on Managing and Retaining Talent

Providing a clear career path with training goals and milestones helps keep employees engaged and ultimately retain talent. For AE firms, this strategy helps them plan for the future to make sure the firm can remain successful. Apparently, this is no secret. Respondents to the 42^nd Deltek AE Clarity Study overwhelmingly ranked create or improve succession and career development planning as a top initiative. Closely followed by developing more formal career development programs. Being leading areas of opportunity for improvement, these initiatives and the others that are highlighted in the 42^nd Deltek AE Clarity Study are things firms should evaluate closely.

Clarity for the Future

Reflecting back, it’s impossible to avoid including the impacts of the global pandemic on businesses. For human resource professionals and AE firm leaders, they sure got the “short end of the stick” with having to adapt and quickly create policies to ensure business can continue as normal and employees are aware of the new expectations. Fortunately, the world is getting back to some sense of normality and those tasked with overseeing their firm’s HCM strategy can get back focusing on hiring and retaining talent, and developing training and succession plans.

During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses across all industries were forced to make quick and decisive decisions. For A&E firms, determining the best plan to keep projects profitable and on schedule became the priority. While many departments were able to quickly adjust to working from home and figuring it out as they went, finance leaders had to determine how to maintain financial controls immediately. The 42^nd Deltek A&E Clarity highlights the success of these efforts in addition to providing some insights on other key financial metrics.

Numbers that Improved

Across the board, A&E firms of all sizes had increased utilization rates in comparison to the previous year. With small firms reporting a little over two percent increase and large firms showing over a one-percent increase. While this increase seems small, it’s actually significant when viewed as a change over a one-year period. Additionally, net revenue per employee also increased for A&E firms of all sizes. When looking back over the last year and comparing other relative information, it’s reasonable to link this improved utilization rate to the fact that firms had minimal growth of personnel. Meaning existing employees are being worked more and firms need to be aware of the negative effects of employee burnout. Make sure to learn about exception reporting and how this can help identify employees that are at risk of burnout.

The overhead rate for A&E firms dropped in comparison to last year which can be linked directly to the decrease in travel and other in-person related expenses. Obviously, this can be attributed to restrictions created by the pandemic, but it also leaves room to wonder if this can be maintained in the future as the world transitions to the “new normal.” Which itself is still unclear, many are predicting a hybrid variation of a remote and in-person work environment. This is even highlighted in the 42^nd Deltek A&E Clarity report as something firms need to evaluate in the future.

The largest indicator of success is the firm’s earnings after all operating expenses are taken out which is referred to as the operating profit on net revenue. Unsurprisingly, A&E firms that responded to the Deltek A&E Clarity survey overwhelmingly indicated an increase with small firms reporting an eleven percent increase over the previous year. Looking back to overhead rate, the pandemic related changes firms were forced to make is a clear connection between these two numbers making it difficult to determine if this will be sustained in future years.

Numbers that Suffered

While success is easy to celebrate, shortcomings also need to be reviewed and given attention. Starting with the net labor multiplier, firms that responded to the 42^nd Deltek A&E Clarity study reported a decline to a minimal increase. Which actually breaks a ten-year trend and reverted net labor multipliers being realized by firms to similar rates of five and six years ago.

An A&E firm’s most consistent indicator of operating performance is the total payroll multiplier. On face value, the total payroll multiplier remained unchanged from the previous year which seems like a win. And might as well be when considering the challenges firms were presented with as a result of the pandemic.

Future Financial Initiatives

Across the board, respondents to the 42^nd A&E Deltek Clarity study stated their top priority is business process improvements which is a consistent leader year after year. Furthermore, this seems like a vague statement that lacks an actual plan action and is likely the yearly list leader for this reason. With all the adversity firms faced throughout the last year, it might be a good time to start implementing a business process improvement plan by first mapping out firm processes to see how these changes have impacted firm operations.

Further down the list of financial initiatives firms wish to address are better managing growth, organizational change, and increasing spending for talent acquisition and retention which are ranked fourth, fifth and sixth respectively. Lumped together, all of these are a component of human capital management. From an employee perspective, this is promising to know that A&E firms are realizing that their value proposition is their people.

Gain Financial Clarity

In the face of uncertainty, A&E financial leaders buckled down by tightening finance controls by embracing technology to keep teams connected. Similar to what other departments within the firm did which is detailed in the technology trends section of the A&E Deltek Clarity report. Further, it’s exciting and promising to see that A&E firms weathered the initial impact of the pandemic fairly well. While the future still has some uncertainties, A&E industry has once again proven to be resilient and capable of overcoming adversity.

Benchmark your firm! Use the link button below to download the 42^nd Deltek A&E Clarity report and scorecard for free.

With the uncertainty of 2020 behind us, many AE firms are optimistic about the future and expect that investment in new technology will likely remain consistent. While a great number of firms are still in the early stages of moving to the cloud and making investments to support a mobile workforce, smaller tech savvy to large-sized firms have already implemented these technologies by 2021 and are seeking out IT solutions that improve project delivery and ultimately their bottom line. According to AE firms that participated in the 42^nd Deltek Clarity study, adopting new technologies to support firm growth and client needs is a priority, however, selecting which technologies will produce the desired results and provide a noteworthy return on investment seems to be a challenge.  

Clarity on Technology Trends for Small Firms

Small AE firms, those with less than 50 employees, reported in the Deltek Clarity study that investments in new and emerging technologies will likely see a reduction. Likely, because many of these firms made larger than expected technology investments in supporting the needs of a remote workforce to ensure business continuity during the pandemic. Therefore, many of these small firms are refocusing efforts and spending on revenue generating resources.

Furthermore, small firms typically have smaller budgets for all departments across the board. As a result, they tend to invest in new technologies that are usually more affordable and easier to deploy firm wide. Which brings up another key finding from the Deltek Clarity study – limited internal IT expertise. Small firms and even medium-sized firms both noted that one of the largest challenges with adopting new technologies is having internal experts to help navigate the sea of technology options that serve different and unique purposes. Even more, some firms are likely unaware of which operational processes can be improved with the assistance of technology.

Medium-sized Firms Looking to Go Big

AE firms with 51 - 249 employees, commonly referred to as medium-sized firms, indicated in their responses to the Deltek Clarity study that they are eyeing big data and artificial intelligence (AI) for future technology solutions to support their organizations. However, only 18% of firms reported having an actual plan in place. With a large percentage of firms citing the aforementioned and seemingly consistent theme of lacking internal champions to identify and thoroughly vet new technology. Overall, medium-sized firms as a whole are continuing to straddle between implementing less expensive and simpler technologies with big aspirations to embrace and invest in emerging technologies large firms are already utilizing.

Large Firms Seek Clarity with Big Investments

Large AE firms, defined as having more than 250 employees, will always lead the AE industry when it comes to adopting the latest and greatest technologies since they generally have larger budgets and the ability to spend. As such, larger AE firms that participated in the Deltek Clarity study stated they are continuing to move forward with making large investments in emerging technologies like geolocation, big data and data science with no indication of slowing down. More importantly, large firms revealed in the Clarity study that they have less of a challenge with employing internal technology experts that can provide guidance on future technology investments that are aligned with the needs of the firm.

Similarities Deltek Clarity Identified for All Firms

According to the 42^nd Deltek Clarity study, firms of all sizes have some shared challenges regarding technology initiatives. Unsurprisingly, data and cybersecurity lead the way like previous years and will likely continue to be the leading concern for AE firms well into the future. An encouraging finding in the Clarity study is the common strategy all firms are taking to mitigate these risks, with nearly half of respondents stating they are implementing new security policies and protocols. Even more, thirty-four percent of respondents said their firm is planning to outsource their IT administration and infrastructure. Although there are no fail proof safeguards against a cyberattack, being proactive can certainly reduce the risks which is what firms are trying to accomplish.

Do More with Technology and Deltek Clarity

One thing is clear from the Deltek Clarity study, AE firms of all sizes will have to continue to invest in technology just to stay competitive. For small and medium-sized firms that indicated they lack internal experts to help make technology investment decisions as a challenge, maybe they need to consider enlisting the assistance of a company that specialize in the technology needs of AE firms to help with these choices.

Lastly, big data and data science are quickly being adopted in the AE industry. As a result, AE firms will begin to see new technology solutions specifically tailored to meet their needs being brought to market over the next few years. Which adds more complexity for firms when it comes time to decide which technology solutions they should pursue in the future.