Full Sail Partners Blog
Is This the End of Deltek Vision’s Revenue Method B?
Revenue Method B is the most widely used revenue method in Deltek Vision. In fairness, this is Vision’s default method for projects whose charge type is Regular. As a result, most firms use it since it’s easy to deploy and seems to work, or so we think.
How Revenue Method B Works
Revenue Method B works well when we have a time & materials project that is billed frequently. In this scenario, we have a perfect match between revenue and costs and can easily measure project performance. On the other hand, when billings and costs don’t align, measuring interim project performance becomes more challenging. Milestone billings or fixed fee projects are billed on cycles that don’t always coincide with a proper revenue accrual or as the associated costs are incurred on the project. Keep in mind that we are not matching revenues and expenses, and this can lead to unreliable financial results during the project life cycle.
For example, a project has a contract provision that calls for $10,000 to be billed at the end of month two. We complete the work in month one at a cost of $3,000 (10,000 billing rate). The financial reconciliation for this project is:
In month one, the project has no income (no billings) and incurs costs of $3,000. With Revenue Method B, the project incurs a $3,000 gross margin loss.
In month two, when the project is billed, we have the reverse situation; $10,000 Revenue and no cost, which results in a $10,000 Gross Margin profit.
So…did we make money or not?
The Results of Using Revenue Method B
From month to month, it is very difficult to assess the true profitability of the project. Therefore, we must wait until a point where billings and costs align or the project is closed. In this simple example, we can look at the end of month 2 and determine our performance. However, what if this project spans over a year or more? With Revenue Method B, we may never have a point where revenue and costs align to make an informed decision on profitability.
To accurately measure performance, a proper matching of revenue and costs is mandatory. Revenue must be earned as work is completed or as the associated costs are incurred. This is the best accounting practice, and with the impending requirement of FASB 606, will now be part of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Clearly, Revenue Method B will not work well when the earnings process does not align with the billing process. For those of us using this method, we are reporting inaccurate results to our stakeholders or making manual adjustments to accommodate for Revenue Method B’s shortcomings. Fortunately, Deltek Vision offers alternatives that will help us properly record revenue and comply with FASB 606.
FASB 606 Implications
In May 2014, FASB 606 was released and will be required by December 2018. FASB 606 will render Revenue Method B obsolete for most projects.
FASB 606 has five elements:
- Identify the contract with the client
- Identify the performance obligations in the contract
- Determine the transaction price
- Allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation
- Recognize Revenue as we satisfy the performance obligations
FASB 606 does not reference billings unless billings specifically follow the earnings process described above. Therefore, to be in compliance with this new requirement, we must abandon Revenue Method B for most of our projects.
Revenue Method B Alternatives in Deltek Vision
Stay tuned for the next chapter…User Defined Revenue Methods. We will look at how we can use Deltek Vision to create Revenue Methods that will comply with FASB 606. In the meantime, click here to learn more about FASB 606.
Subscribe Here!
Latest Posts
Posts By Category
- Professional Services (230)
- Technology Solutions (153)
- Deltek Vision (120)
- Building Business (110)
- Deltek Vantagepoint (109)
- Accounting (98)
- Project Management (93)
- CRM (71)
- Press Release (61)
- ERP (53)
- HR (53)
- Client Relationships (48)
- Marketing (48)
- Professional Services Firms (41)
- Deltek Clarity Report (27)
- Support (20)
- A&E Firms (19)
- Finance (19)
- Employees (18)
- Business Intelligence (17)
- Cloud (17)
- Project Based Firms (17)
- Deltek Talent (16)
- Video (16)
- Mobile (15)
- Communication (9)
- Deltek Insight (9)
- Mergers and Acquisitions (9)
- Data Visualization (8)
- Project Information Management (PIM) (8)
- Case Study (6)
- Executives (6)
- Driving Growth (4)
- Information Technology (4)
- business development (4)
- Human Capital Management (3)
- Resource Management (3)
- THOUGHT LEADERSHIP (3)
- human resources (3)
- Connect Add-In (2)
- Contract Management (2)
- Outsourced HR (2)
- Project Con (2)
- Proposal (2)
- Deltek + ComputerEase (1)
- Deltek Dela (1)
- Deltek ProjectCon (1)
- Outsourced Accounting (1)
- ProjectCon (1)
- SEO (1)
- password security (1)
Posts by Author
- Amanda McClain (3)
- Amanda Roussel (17)
- Amy Balassone (9)
- Aria Bounds (1)
- Bryce Crosby (1)
- Cate Phillips (9)
- Chris Simei (2)
- Cynthia Fuoco (1)
- Dale Busbey (6)
- Erin Haver (1)
- Evan Creech-Pritchett (24)
- Full Sail Partners (104)
- Gina Stamper (2)
- Heath Harris (4)
- Jeff Robers (1)
- Jennifer Renfroe (64)
- Jennifer Stevland (1)
- Jennifer Wilson (2)
- Jenny Labranche (4)
- Joel Slater (8)
- Katie Sanner (1)
- Kelly Duquette (2)
- Kevin Hebblethwaite (8)
- Kim Stamps (2)
- Lee Frederiksen (1)
- Lindsay Diven (39)
- Lisa Ahearn (5)
- Matt McCauley (3)
- Michael Kessler, PMP (18)
- Nia Collins (1)
- Nicole Temple (3)
- Peter Nuffer (5)
- Rana Blair (20)
- Rhiannon Schaumburg (2)
- Rick Childs (7)
- Ryan Felkel (85)
- Ryan Suydam (10)
- Sarah Gonnella (66)
- Scott Gailhouse (20)
- Scott Seal (12)
- Sean Keller (1)
- Sparsha Muppidi (1)
- Stephany Socha (1)
- Tasia Grant, PHR (16)
- Terri Agnew, CPA (9)
- Theresa Depew (8)
- Timothy Burns (5)
- Tom Vandervort (1)
- Wendy Gustafson (17)
- Wes Renfroe (15)
- Wesley Witsken (2)